Core Systems: Starting a Whole New Game?
Which game are you in? Are the systems you're buying for the game just finishing, or the digital game that is just starting?
Which game are you in? Are the systems you're buying for the game just finishing, or the digital game that is just starting?
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Karen Furtado, a partner at SMA, is a recognized industry expert in the core systems space. Given her exceptional knowledge of policy administration, rating, billing and claims, insurers seek her unparalleled knowledge in mapping solutions to business requirements and IT needs.
A property owner is 27 times more likely to experience a flood than a fire, yet only 20% of the flood damage caused by Harvey was insured.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Jennifer Torneden is a senior vice president and head of sales and distribution for Aon Affinity, a global insurance broker.
While agencies have survived without a strong marketing strategy and plan in the past, those days are long over.
Based on conversations we have every day, we know the concept and execution of a successful marketing strategy is one of the greatest challenges that benefits agencies struggle with. While agencies have survived without such a strategy and plan in the past, those days are over. Sadly, not only do we hear of the marketing challenges every single day, we also hear the excuses as to why agencies can’t or, more accurately, won’t embrace marketing.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Kevin Trokey is founding partner and coach at Q4intelligence. He is driven to ignite curiosity and to push the industry through the barriers that hold it back. As a student of the insurance industry, he channels his own curiosity by observing and studying the players, the changing regulations, and the business climate that influence us all.
Technologies such as drones are often classified as emerging but are, in fact, relatively mature--and being widely adopted.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Mark Breading is a partner at Strategy Meets Action, a Resource Pro company that helps insurers develop and validate their IT strategies and plans, better understand how their investments measure up in today's highly competitive environment and gain clarity on solution options and vendor selection.
Pressure-testing the company's defenses can determine whether they can repel targeted, high-impact attacks, whether external or internal.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Mike de Waal is senior vice president of sales at Majesco.
The continuous cycle of launch, learn, adapt and relaunch is where Experience Design excels.
The relentless pace of the digital age continues to change insurers’ strategies. However, for more than a decade, two constants have been the need: 1) for a customer-oriented mindset and 2) for adapting quickly to an increasingly fast-paced world. As carriers have tried to come to grips with new ways of doing business, one of the biggest recent developments at the corporate level is Experience Design owning a seat at the table. Why? For starters, Experience Design has hard-won expertise and plays a vital role in the customer experience and brand architecture. In addition, Experience Design teams are good at solving problems and often have experience doing so in multiple industries. Instead of trying to figure out after strategy planning what the future could be, involving Experience Design will help carriers define it from the outset. Building on existing strengths Although some industries are further ahead in digital capabilities, design and customer experience than insurance, most insurers do have some real strengths. First and foremost, they tend to have a very solid understanding of their customers. Moreover, they have extensive experience adapting products and services to changing market conditions. See also: In Search of a New ‘Dominant Design’ However, digital has profoundly changed the way carriers interact with customers and how quickly and frequently they need to act. New technologies have amplified the need to listen more closely to customers and respond to their needs in weeks and months instead of months and years. Almost all carriers can do a better job taking the insight they possess and quickly turning it into something actionable, such as more flexible and adaptive products and more frequent and meaningful interactions with customers (and on their terms). Always on What makes this change in focus difficult for most insurers is that they’ve historically operated in a stop-start, point-A-to-point-B manner. But, in a digital environment, constant improvement is now the rule of thumb. Recognizing that work gets done but is never really finished is a major shift in thinking for the industry. See also: How to Redesign Customer Experience In response, leading carriers are no longer looking for a big launch but are incrementally improving products, even if they evolve into something quite different than their original form. This continuous cycle of launch, learn, adapt and relaunch is where Experience Design excels. As carriers increasingly involve creative solutions and get better at working in the always-on business cycle, their product offerings and relationships with customers will improve.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Marie Carr is the global growth strategy lead and a partner with PwC's U.S. financial services practice, where she serves numerous Fortune 500 insurance and financial services clients.
Over more than 30 years, her work has helped executive teams leverage market disruption and innovation to create competitive advantage. In addition, she regularly consults to corporate boards on the impacts of social, technological, economic, environmental and political change.
Carr is the insurance sector champion and has overseen the development of numerous PwC insurance thought leadership pieces, including PwC's annual Next in Insurance and Top Insurance Industry Issues reports.
Tom Kavanaugh is a partner in the financial services practice at PwC. He oversees the customer impact practice for insurance and has more than 15 years of experience with creating innovation concepts, growth and market-entry strategies.
Parametric insurance products could provide immediate relief through automatic payouts to vulnerable people in affected areas.
Last year saw some of the deadliest and costliest wildfires in California history. With the long-term impacts of the Camp and Woolsley fires still being felt months later, many in California are already thinking ahead and considering how best to prepare for future wildfire seasons. The problem is only going to get worse due to climate change: The total area exposed to wildfires is increasing, and the wildfire season continues to grow longer. Recognizing this new reality, the California Senate recently passed a bill that would authorize the state to purchase insurance to mitigate the costs associated with natural disasters such as wildfires. When fires threaten a community, all evacuees (even those lucky enough to have homes they can eventually return to) will incur financial impact – from lost wages to the cost of emergency accommodations. These expenses are not generally covered by insurance, leaving a serious protection gap at a vulnerable time. Parametric insurance products could provide immediate financial relief in the form of automatic pay-outs for insureds living in the evacuation zone – these products present an intriguing protection option for California residents and communities. Automatically Triggered by Pre-Defined Events Parametric insurance, also known as index insurance, is an innovative product that pays a fixed sum when a precisely defined event takes place – for example, wind of more than a certain speed at a specified location. The insurance is not a direct substitute for conventional insurance because of the "basis risk" – the potential gap between the policyholder's loss and the payout. But the upsides are certainty and a rapid payout, because there is no claim to be made or adjusted. Those upsides could be appealing in certain circumstances. Parametric insurance is increasingly being used in the developing world to fund rapid relief and recovery in response to natural disasters, such as drought leading to crop failure. There are moves to develop products that will make a partial payout in advance (for example, if a major storm is forecast) to fund even earlier intervention. As the impact of climate is felt more widely, we may see an increased take-up of parametric insurance in the developed world, too. California wildfires could be a particular case. Evacuation Costs Impose a Financial Burden Emergency relief shelters generally provide aid within the first few days of fires, but displaced evacuees soon have to look to other housing options. Reports on the aftermath of disasters show that nearby hotel and motel rates jump. Aside from housing costs, evacuees are often forced to pay out-of-pocket expenses for food, gas and emergency supplies. Evacuees with homeowner or renter insurance coverage may have traditional insurance policies that eventually help with these costs. Policies with inclusions for “Additional Living Expenses” (“ALE”) typically cover food and housing costs, furniture rental, relocation and storage and extra transportation expenses. However, under the traditional insurance model, insurers will reimburse residents for ALE only after a claim has been filed and adjusted. See also: How to Fight Growing Risk of Wildfire Regardless of whether an evacuee is eligible to receive ALE, the scale of destruction leaves many evacuees uncertain as to how they will afford cost-of-living expenses in the immediate-run. Evacuees unable to afford these costs are subsequently left at the mercy – and often slow response – of government-funded emergency relief. Parametric Insurance Can Provide Financial Emergency Relief Parametric insurance can fill the protection gap, providing wildfire evacuees with rapid funding when they are forced to evacuate. Recently approved California legislation will require local emergency notification systems to warn residents of impending danger, and these warnings could serve as a trigger. A parametric insurance product offered to local municipalities may likewise afford cities and counties with quick and predictable funds. Government emergency relief funds are initially paid to cover state emergency operations. Local municipalities affected by wildfires rely heavily on relief from non-profit organizations, but, when such relief cannot adequately address immediate and longer-term financial needs, the burden is placed back on the residents to pay expenses out of their own pockets. Parametric insurance policies can be crafted to uniquely address the needs of regions threatened by climate catastrophes. For example, some of those exposed might have traditional insurance policies with significant excesses. Parametric insurance could be used in conjunction with these, so the policyholder receives a speedy payout when cash flow is tight during an evacuation, and then make a conventional claim for the balance of the loss. Whether used independently or in conjunction with other insurance, a parametric insurance product will lessen many of the financial burdens associated with wildfire evacuations. A Greater Role for Parametric Insurance Potential wildfire evacuees are one group that may benefit greatly from a parametric insurance product, but they aren’t the only Californians who could benefit from the predictability and efficiency these products can afford. Parametric insurance is currently used to insure crops from failure due to various weather conditions. This product can similarly be modeled to wineries and commercial agriculturists in Northern California who are concerned that wind, ash and debris from wildfires could diminish quality. With climate change increasing the devastation of wildfires in California, parametric insurance can play an important role in responding to the increasing financial burdens placed on the affected residents. See also: The Challenges Ahead in 2019 Beyond California The number of natural disasters that have wreaked havoc in California recently make the state a natural outlet for parametric insurance products, but it is far from the only area of the country where these products may be useful. Hurricanes routinely leave long-term damage throughout the U.S., from Texas to Puerto Rico to New York; in fact, the number of weather-related loss events in this country has tripled since the 1980s. The ability to provide rapid funding for relief, recovery and reconstruction efforts is an essential need, and parametric insurance provides an effective solution. There is no simple or one-size-fits-all solution to natural disaster protection. But novel forms of risk transfer such as parametric insurance hold a great deal of potential. This resilience-linked product is an excellent example of how the insurance industry can respond to weather-related threats in effective ways, and represents a key opportunity for future innovation.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
San Francisco-based Clyde & Co partner Peter Whalen practices in the area of commercial litigation with a focus on insurance coverage. He has extensive jury trial, appellate and alternative dispute resolution experience.
The most severely affected patients are unable to work, have trouble with relationships and have great difficulty parenting their children.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Mark Walls is the vice president, client engagement, at Safety National.
He is also the founder of the Work Comp Analysis Group on LinkedIn, which is the largest discussion community dedicated to workers' compensation issues.
The dispiriting news that 11 people died this year in efforts to summit Mount Everest brought back memories of my callow youth, when I volunteered to make the attempt for a story for the Wall Street Journal. There may also be a hopeful lesson for how the insurance industry can mature.
The Everest attempt would have been part of an informal series in which I played daredevil. I sailed across the Atlantic in a 42-foot boat, having never even set foot on a sailboat before, and wrote a front-page piece about the adventure (including 70-foot waves). A couple of years later, a friend convinced me that I was just dumb enough to go to a school for professional wrestlers and provide an inside look. After I wrestled a match on cable-TV in 1989 and wrote my article, the WSJ's managing editor showed the video to the Dow Jones board of directors and won me a corporate award for service above and beyond the call. He told me by summoning me to his office and saying he had good news and bad news. The good news: "I have a $1,000 check for you." The bad news: "I'm looking for someone to swim around Manhattan."
I responded that I wasn't much of a swimmer but that I'd happily climb Mount Everest if he'd put up the fees. His response was incorrect but potentially life-saving: "Nah," he said, "it's getting too easy."
Fast-forward to 1996, and we all learned just how dangerous Everest still was even though Sherpas were installing ropes and ladders for the tourists everywhere they could. 1996 was the year when journalist Jon Krakauer (a veteran climber, unlike neophyte me) summited Everest, then witnessed the series of events that left eight climbers dead.
I got the message and never again considered an attempt, but the number of climbers keeps growing—as does the death toll. Sixteen Sherpas died in an avalanche in April 2014 as they set up base camp. Nineteen people died in an avalanche on the mountain a year later when a 7.8 earthquake devastated Nepal, killing more than 9,000. Five people died on Everest in 2018, a year in which more than 250 foreigners summited. And this year, 11 died despite no particular issues with weather.
So, what's my hope for the insurance industry? Doesn't Everest just show that people can convince themselves to ignore even deadly risks?
My hope stems from seeing how much more information is available to climbers and guides than was available in 1996, the season that Krakauer chronicled in "Into Thin Air," and in understanding how much improvement is still possible. The increased "wiring" of the mountain could serve as an example of how technology can head off catastrophes—the sort of thing that insurers increasingly need to do, rather than focusing on pricing the risk and paying claims after a loss.
In 1996, there was barely any communication with those at the top of the mountain -- just some occasional connection via a satellite phone—so information about weather was limited for climbers. One who summited that year prepared to bask at the top, only to look out and realize that a major storm was fast approaching. He recognized the cloud formation solely because he was a commercial airline pilot and not, say, a journalist. He hightailed it down from the summit and, through sheer happenstance, survived the whiteout that led to the eight deaths.
By contrast, a doctor saved himself last year through technology. He brought along an oxygen saturation meter, which, when pressed against his skin, told him that a feeling of weakness wasn't just something to push through: His blood was dangerously low in oxygen, showing that he was headed toward a lung condition that is often fatal at high altitude and that he needed to head down immediately and abandon the ascent.
Many people succumb to what climbers call "summit fever"—you've worked so hard, and you're so close, how can you turn back even if your body feels like it's shutting down? Ten of the 11 who died this year had summited and were on their way down when they collapsed. Fitbit-like medical technology will increasingly let climbers measure their physical state and understand when their health is at a critical level and that they need to turn back to save themselves.
Information about conditions near the summit will keep getting better, too, and not just for the weather. Many of us have seen the photo showing stop-and-go traffic near the summit on May 22, but few have seen the photos from a Sherpa in the same spot a week earlier, when nary another soul was in sight. As climbing parties become more connected, it'll be easier to manage traffic. Maybe you move your attempt up a day or back a day if you think you're just going to sit there for hours in the "death zone" (above 8,000 meters, or roughly 26,000 feet), where the altitude takes a monstrous toll.
Everest will still have its allure—K2 is a much harder ascent, but who brags about climbing the world's second-highest mountain? And many will enable climbers. Nepal, such a poor country, isn't going to turn away people willing to pay $11,000 apiece for a climbing permit and to generally pump money into the economy. Guides, charging some $35,000 a pop on top of the permits, aren't going to turn away clients, either. There will always be something asynchronous about a summit attempt, too—months of training and weeks of adjusting to altitude end up in daily or even hourly decisions about weather and in instantaneous assessments of health.
But there's still hope that much better information will lead to better decisions about when to take the risk and when to wait for another day. That's the plan from sea level, anyway.
Cheers,
Paul Carroll
Editor-in-Chief
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Paul Carroll is the editor-in-chief of Insurance Thought Leadership.
He is also co-author of A Brief History of a Perfect Future: Inventing the Future We Can Proudly Leave Our Kids by 2050 and Billion Dollar Lessons: What You Can Learn From the Most Inexcusable Business Failures of the Last 25 Years and the author of a best-seller on IBM, published in 1993.
Carroll spent 17 years at the Wall Street Journal as an editor and reporter; he was nominated twice for the Pulitzer Prize. He later was a finalist for a National Magazine Award.
While data science is becoming a valuable tool in the insurance industry, implementing a data science program is not easy.
Get Involved
Our authors are what set Insurance Thought Leadership apart.
|
Partner with us
We’d love to talk to you about how we can improve your marketing ROI.
|
Ryohei Fujimaki is the founder and CEO of dotData, a spinoff of NEC and the first company focused on delivering end-to-end data science automation for the enterprise.