Advertisement

http://insurancethoughtleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/bg-h1.png

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

January 15, 2018

RPA in Insurance: Short-Term Solution

Summary:

Robotic process automation provides huge benefits, but insurers may invest too heavily in RPA if they treat it as a long-term answer.

Photo Courtesy of Pixabay

The rise of robotic process automation (RPA) in insurance has coincided with many similar emerging technologies, such as AI and chatbots, but interest in RPA is more about fixing legacy integration issues than embracing forward-looking tech. It serves as a cost-effective, short-term solution for complex infrastructure issues – replacing manual integration points with a scriptable, automatable solution – and in the insurance industry that may be more important than the most advanced AI available.

Novarica does have concerns about insurers relying too heavily on RPA as a permanent fix, and insurers face the risk of investing too heavily in RPA if they treat it as a long-term solution rather than a temporary fix. RPA won’t make problems from siloed legacy systems go away, and CIOs considering its use should make reasonable plans for true integration and modernization in the future. At some point, insurers need to tear off the Band-Aid and consider infrastructure optimization over cost. That being said, it’s also true that even as insurers modernize there will always be new legacy systems in the environment, and it’s likely RPA (or RPA-like technology) will have a place in future architectures, as well.

There are two types of RPA vendors: those that offer RPA solutions (software providers), and vendors that resell solutions as well as offer assistance in developing RPA strategies and implementing RPA solutions (service providers). While many vendors are shifting the message about RPA from a tactical process automation technology to more strategic transformational use cases, this is not how RPA technology is currently being used in the insurance industry. Rather, most use cases are tactical, intended to solve specific problems of integration between systems. In a particularly interesting use case, Zurich – in collaboration with Capgemini – recently used Blue Prism’s RPA solution to automate the issuance of standardized international insurance policies.

See also: 3 Ways RPA Enables Growth  

By and large, RPA is used for sub-processes in billing, claims, finance, HR and policy issuance, among others, the goal of which is to automate data handoffs from one system to another rather than requiring humans to enter the information manually. This cuts down on the inevitable inaccuracies of manual data entry and frees human resources to perform more complex tasks. One drawback is that the bots have to be reprogrammed any time forms or processes change, or if there’s an exception that hasn’t been taken into account – a more strategic approach to RPA would involve developing an enterprise-wide platform, centralized governance and integration with AI-related technologies to not only mechanically execute processes but to learn, analyze and make decisions.

For more on this, see my recent brief, RPA in Insurance: Overview and Prominent Providers.

description_here

About the Author

Jeff Goldberg is an executive vice president of research and consulting at Novarica. His expertise includes data analytics and big data, digital strategy, policy administration, reinsurance management, insurtech and innovation, SaaS and cloud computing.

+ READ MORE about this author ...

Like this Post? Share it!

Add a Comment or Ask a Question

blog comments powered by Disqus
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!