Tag Archives: Webroot

Firms Ally to Respond to Data Breaches

More companies than ever realize they’ve been breached, and many more than you might think have begun to put processes in place to respond to breaches.

A survey of 567 U.S. executives conducted by the Ponemon Institute and Experian found that 43% of organizations reported suffering at least one security incident, up from 10% in 2013. And 73% of the companies surveyed have data breach response plans in place, up from just 12% in 2013.

“Compared with last year’s study results, survey findings show encouraging signs that organizations are beginning to better prioritize data breach prevention, but more needs to be done,” says Larry Ponemon, namesake founder of Ponemon Institute.

Major data breaches have become a staple of news headlines. So it can’t be that companies are complacent. The problem seems to be that big organizations just can’t move quickly enough.

Home Depot was blind to intruders plundering customer data even as Target endured exposure and criticism for being similarly victimized just months before, possibly by the same gang.

In our connected world, it’s hard to keep pace. The Ponemon study found 78% of companies do not account for changes in threats or as processes at a company change.

Rise of threat intelligence

That’s where the trend toward correlating data from disparate threat sensors could begin to close the gap. It’s a promising sign that ultra-competitive security companies have begun to collaborate more on sharing and analyzing threat intelligence.

Boulder, Colo.-based security vendor LogRhythm, for instance, has formed an alliance with CrowdStrike, Norse, Symantec, ThreatStream and Webroot to share sensor data and compare notes on traffic that looks suspicious.

LogRhythm supplies a platform for culling and analyzing data from its partner vendors “to help identify threats in our customers’ IT environments more quickly, with fewer false positives and fewer false negatives,” says Matt Winter, LogRhythm’s vice president of corporate and business development.

Since announcing its Threat Intelligence Ecosystem last month, LogRhythm has received “considerable inbound interest from customers and channel partners,” Winter says. “Feedback has been very positive.”

Similar threat intelligence alliances, both formal and informal, are taking shape throughout the tech security world. The business model of Hexis Cyber Solutions, a year-old startup, relies on pooling threat sensor data from several security vendors, including antivirus giant Symantec and social media malware detection firm ZeroFOX.

Hexis applies analytics with the goal of accurately identifying – and automatically removing – clearly malicious programs.

“The state of the art today is a single-point security product triggering alerts on particular things and putting a warning on a screen,” says Chris Fedde, president of Hexis. “We’re all about analyzing alerts and taking action on them. Anything that’s malicious we go ahead and remove.”

In one recent pilot study, Hexis tracked 5,000 computing devices and 13,000 user accounts of a U.S. medical center for 30 days. Hexis intercepted 35,000 incidences of suspicious outside contacts and removed 23 malicious files.

Those malicious files that got inside the medical center’s network included: Dirtjumper, a tool used to conduct denial of service attacks; Tsumani, malware used for spamming and data theft; a remote access tool (RAT) used to take full control of a compromised computer; and an adware Trojan.

There’s a long way to go. But alliances to share threat sensor information, like the ones being pioneered by LogRhythm, Hexis and many other security vendors, seem destined to take root.

Someday in the not too distant future, it may not matter if intruders get inside the network, if robust threat intelligence systems are poised to cut them off from doing damage.

Phishers’ New Ruse: Trusted Tech Brands

Most of us don’t think twice about opening and maintaining multiple free email accounts where we live out our digital lives. And we’re getting more and more comfortable by the day at downloading and using mobile apps.

Yet those behaviors can harm us. ThirdCertainty sat down with David Duncan, chief marketing officer for threat intelligence and security company Webroot, to discuss how cyber criminals are hustling to take advantage of our love of free Web mail services and nifty mobile apps.

Infographic: Where malicious phishers lurk

3C: Phishing attacks leveraging our love of Google, Apple, Yahoo, Facebook and Dropbox are skyrocketing. How come?

dd

David Duncan, Webroot chief marketing officer

Duncan: There are 10 times more phishing attacks based on emulating tech companies than financial firms. You’d think it would be the other way around, but it’s not. The focus is on stealing information from your various email accounts because it’s easier to spoof people into acting on something that appears to come from Google or Apple than from Bank of America or Citibank.

Free resource: Stay informed with a free subscription to SPWNR

3C: Because we’re less suspicious of Google and Apple than big banks?

Duncan: Yes. Phishers prey on the fact that we see those brands as trustworthy brands.

3C: What ruses should folks watch out for?

Duncan: It’s the typical ones. You’ll get something advising you of the need to change your password or share your contacts. They’ll send you a link to click. A certain percentage of gullible users will click on the link and follow instructions to give up their credentials.

I can’t say I know of any specific new strategies other than the fact that the focus is on impersonating big domains like Google and Yahoo because people don’t think too much about something that appears to be coming from those trusted sources.

3C: Is there really a one-in-three chance the average person will fall for a phishing scam?

Duncan: Yes, there is a 30% chance of Internet users falling for a zero-day phishing attack over the course of the year. It used to be about one out of every seven phishing emails actually got through. But we’re human beings, which means we’re gullible.

3C: What about mobile apps? What’s the risk there?

Duncan: A year ago, we tracked about 8 million mobile apps, and around 75% were trustworthy and 10% were benign. So 15% were malicious or suspicious. Now we’re classifying 15 million mobile apps, and we’re finding 35% to 40% are suspicious or malicious in character.

3C: That’s a pretty significant change.

Duncan: People don’t think of installing an app on their mobile device as installing a potentially unwanted application that’s being delivered from an untrustworthy app store.

3C: So is this mostly an Android exposure?

Duncan: Probably 90% is Android, maybe 10% is iOS. Apple has a more secured kind of walled guard for verifying and authenticating the source of applications. But it also depends on what users are accustomed to. If you go over to certain geographies in the world, people may not necessarily always go to the iTunes store. There are a lot of third-party websites where even iOS apps are cheaper or they’re free.