Tag Archives: scott walchek

Insuring What You Want, When You Want

DIAmond Award winner Trōv is one of the most widely referred to cases when speaking about disruption in the insurance sector. But what is Trōv exactly about? What is the business model? How successful is it? Trōv’s founder and CEO Scott Walchek will share his vision in a keynote presentation at DIA Amsterdam, this May. To warm up, I interviewed Scott last week.

Trōv is the world’s first on-demand insurance platform for single items. It is a mobile app that allows users to insure whatever, whenever. It empowers customers to insure “just the things you care about” for whatever period you prefer. Trōv users simply snap a picture of a receipt or the product code of a product. This creates a personal digital repository for all things tangible. For selected items, Trōv offers a quote to insure each individual item. Customers can then simply “swipe to protect” to purchase the insurance. It is equally simple to “swipe to unprotect.” With Trōv, long contracts are not necessary. Even the claims process is automated with the use of chatbots and available on-demand on a smart phone.

Trōv is founded by Scott Walchek. Scott is a successful technology entrepreneur. Over the past 25 years, he built companies such as Macromedia, Sanctuary Woods, C2B Technologies and DebtMarket. He was also a co-lead investor and founding director of Baidu, China’s largest search engine.

Scott is also one of the 75 thought leaders who contributed to our new book “Reinventing Customer Engagement. The next level of digital transformation for banks and insurers.”

What inspired you to create Trōv?

Scott: “At some point I realized there is an enormous latent value in the information related to the things people own. From obvious things such as receipts and warranties to actually having an overview of what you own and what the current replacement value of each item is. We want to curate ways to turn this into value for consumers. From keeping information on items up to date to, for instance, arranging insurance for these items.

We’re a technology company, not an insurance company. We’re new in this space. So I started with testing our first ideas about a proposition and the assumptions behind it with several senior executives of large P&C insurers such as AIG and ACE. What I assumed is that at the end of the day the core metric of success is the ratio of insurance to actual value. The better this ratio, the better the balance sheet.

Of course, this is an oversimplification, but everyone agreed that in essence this is how over the past 200 years value in insurance is created. Now, what is remarkable is that insurers do not really know what consumers own, and what the exact value of these goods is … What if they did know? This would disrupt markets. It would lead to much better risk assessment driven by real knowledge of the true value of what people really own.”

See also: Insurtech: The Approaching Storm  

Trōv’s main target users are millennials, a target segment that most incumbents find very difficult to reach and engage with. Why does Trōv strike the right chord among this generation?

Scott: “We’re in the Australian market for a year now and entered the U.K. market a few months ago. Around 75% of our users are aged between 18 and 24. It appears that we are successful in tapping into the specific needs of this group. We do this by explicitly tapping into four key millennial trends. The first is “on-demand.” We can see that from how millennials consume entertainment, shopping etc. Services need to be now, 24 hours a day, on my device. The second trend is, “Don’t lock me into a lengthy contract.” We enable micro-duration. Customers can turn their insurance on and off as they see fit. In practice, they hardly do. But it is about the psychological benefit of being able to do so. The third is what we call “unbundled convenience”: “Let me choose what to protect, the things I really care about.” The fourth is: “people/agent optional.” Millennials want to engage with their smartphone without having to talk to an actual person.”

Trōv is based in the San Francisco Bay Area. But you decided to launch first in Australia and the U.K. Why there?

Scott: “Ha ha – there’s a linear story and a non-linear story to that! The linear story is that microduration is still new to the industry, so our hypothesis requires testing. The regulatory environment is important if you want to get to market fast. Australia and the U.K. have a single regulatory authority versus the 56 bodies in the U.S. But we’re also in the process of filing in the U.S. The non-linear story is that I just happened to meet Kirsten Dunlop, head of strategic innovation at Suncorp Personal Insurance, at a conference in Meribel in France. She immediately understood the strategic impact of Trōv, and that is when it took off.”

Because the Trōv concept is so new to consumers, it must be extremely interesting to learn what exactly strikes the right chord …

Scott: “Customers just love the experience. Our NPS is +49. However, we’re learning every day. With a completely new concept such as Trōv, it is impossible to know exactly what to expect, honestly. It turns out that Trōv reveals new consumer insights. There is still a significant number of valuables that our audience wants to insure but that we cannot provide a quote for, for instance. Although more than 60% never turn off an insurance, the ability to switch an insurance on and off turns out to be an important psychological benefit. This appears to be category-dependent. Sporting goods are switched on and off more often than smartphones and laptops.

We’re constantly measuring and improving every step of the funnel. From leaving Facebook to downloading the app, to registration, to actual swipes. We will share concrete numbers on uptake and conversion rates at DIA Amsterdam. But to already share two big learnings: We designed Trōv for use on smartphones, but, much to our surprise funnel figures multiplied when we decided to add a web interface. And we are actually even attracting better-quality customers.”

In Australia, you decided to partner with Suncorp, in the U.K. with AXA and in the U.S. with Munich Re. What are the success factors of a partnership between an insurtech and an incumbent?

Scott: “At the end of the day, it is about relationships and people. We understand their internal challenges. Everyone agrees that real knowledge of individual insured goods and the actual value of those goods improves the loss ratio. But we need to figure out how this works exactly through experimentation. This requires internal dedication, throughout the whole organization, starting at the top. It is not about conducting small pilots, but the willingness to experiment while going all the way, invest for several years and learn as we go what insurance will look like in the future and how consumers want to engage.”

What are your future plans and ambitions with Trōv? We can imagine that Trōv could also be an interesting partner for retailers and producers of durables. With Trōv, they could seamlessly sell insurance …

Scott: “We have three lines of business. The first is what we call “solid.” This is about expanding the Trōv app geographically, covering more categories and continuously developing the technology. Trōv will be launched in Japan, Germany and Canada shortly. Then there is “liquid”; offering white-label solutions to financial institutions, for instance in relation to connected cars and homes. The third line of business is “gas”; basically Trōv technology embedded in other applications; insurance as a service. This could be attractive for all sorts of merchants, telco operators etc.”

See also: Understanding Insurtech: the ABCs  

This would make Trōv even more part of the context in which consumers makes decisions about the risk they are willing and not willing to incur. And it also taps into the exponential growth of connected devices, similar to how machine-to-machine payments are increasingly taking place …

Scott: “Yes. What we’re now doing with Trōv is really the beginning. Trōv is about providing our customers with exactly the protection they want, exactly when they want it. With more and more connected devices and sensors and new data streams everywhere we can make the whole experience so seamless they don’t have to do anything at all.”

$1.2 Trillion Disruption in Personal Insurance

Most of us don't think much about insurance. That's by design, of course. Insurance is supposed to be a safety net that affords us the leisure of not thinking about it. Unless of course, we have to. That generally happens about once a year when we're reacquainted with our premium. Ouch. According to statisticians, most of us will also have to think about our insurance about once every seven to eight years when we'll encounter a loss of some sort. Another ouch.

My insurance is pretty confusing. I pay for coverage of my house – a fairly precise calculation based on its quality, size, age, materials, etc. I get a guarantee that, if I keep paying my premium, my home will be covered for its replacement costs. That's pretty reassuring. But then it gets a little weird. I get a “blanket” (insurance-speak is very comforting), which is really a formula that assumes that all the stuff I own is worth, um, somewhere around 50% to 70% of the value of my home. Huh? Maybe there's a bit of science to this, but surely there's a lot of guess…and, according to research, about 39% of the time the formula is just wrong. (As one insurance CEO recently confessed to me, most folks are probably 50% underinsured). The complications go on: If I own something really valuable, some bauble or collectible, well, that has to go on a list of things that are really valuable, and those things get their own coverage. Then, so my stuff continues to be well-protected, I have to re-estimate the value of those things from time to time, or employ an appraiser. What's more, if I buy something or donate something I own, or if any of my things goes down or up in value for whatever reason, my insurance doesn't change — because my provider doesn't know about these changes. And, if you've ever had a claim to file, the process starts with the assumption of fraud, with the burden of proof borne by the policyholder, because most people don't have an accurate accounting of their possessions and their value. Still another ouch.

So while I'm not supposed to be thinking about insurance, maybe I should be paying closer attention.  

Change is coming like a freight train, and its impact has the potential to shake one of the world's largest industries to its core. For a little perspective: The property and casualty insurance industry collected some $1.2 trillion (!) in premiums in 2012, (or about twice the annual GDP of Switzerland). 

At the core of the P/C insurance enterprise is (and I know I am simplifying here) the insurance-to-value ratio, which estimates whether there's enough capital reserved to insure the value of items insured —  if values go up, there'd better be enough money around in case of a loss. All good, right? Except that for as long as actuaries have been actuarying, the value side of that ratio has been a guess — especially for personal property (the stuff I own other than my home). So, if I forget to tell my insurer about something I bought, or if I no longer own that painting, watch, collectible, antique; or if the precious metal in my jewelry has increased…then what? Am I paying too much, or am I underinsured for the current value of the things I own? Of course, these massive companies make calculated allowances for the opacity…but these allowances also cost us policyholders indirectly in increased premiums, and the inefficiency costs the insurer in potential returns on capital. 

The coming changes can be summarized in terms of three trends. First is the expectation of the connected generations, now entering their most acquisitive years and set to inherit $30 trillion of personal wealth. Second is the connected availability of current data about the value of things. Third is the emergence of the personal digital locker for things.

Data, data! I want my data! — the expectation of the connected generations.

If they're anything, the connected generations are data-savvy and mobile. If you’ve shopped for just about anything with a Millennial recently, you’re familiar with their reliance on real-time data about products, local deals, on-line values and even local inventories. (I was with one of Google's brains, and he showed me how retailers are now sending Google local inventory data so now it can post availability and price of a searched-for item at a local store). Smartphone usage is nearly 90% for Gen Xers and Millennials, and data is mother's milk to the children of the connected generations who are being weaned on a diet rich with direct (disintermediated) access to comparisons, descriptions, opinions, crowd-sourced knowledge and even current values. The emerging generations rarely rely on the intermediation of experts (unless validated on a popular blog with a mass following) and are not likely to be satisfied with an indirect relationship with those affecting their financial health. Smartphones in hand, depending on data in the cloud, they will demand and receive visibility into the data shaping all their risk decisions.    

And here's where the insurance revolution will begin: A connected generation that is apt to disintermediate and has access to real-time info on just about any thing will demand that they insure only what they own (bye bye, blanket); that their insurance should track to real values, not formulaic guesses; and that they have the ability to reprice more frequently than once a year. 

The time is coming for variable-rate insurance that reflects changes in the values of items insured and is offered on a real-time basis for any item that the owner deems valuable. 

The price is wrong — the real-time valuation of everything.

Over the past few years, several data services have sprung up whose charters are similar: something like developing the world's largest collection of data about products — their descriptions, suggested retail price, current resale value, user manuals, photos and the like. No one has yet dominated, but it's early yet, and someone (or probably a few) will conquer the objective. Similarly, there are a few excellent companies that are collecting and indexing for speedy retrieval the information about every collectible that has been sold at auction for the past 15 years. I know something of these endeavors because our core product relies on the availability and accuracy of these data providers to collect the values (and other attributes) of the items people are putting into their Trovs (our moniker for the personal cloud for things). It is only a matter of time before we will be able to accurately assign a fair market value to most every thing — in real-time and without human intervention. This real-time value transparency will transform the way that insurance is priced, and how financial institutions view total wealth.

My stuff in the clouds — the automated collection and secure storage for the information about my things.

Within 12 to 24 months, connected consumers will embrace applications that will automatically (as much as possible) collect the information about all they own and store it in a secure, personal cloud-hosted locker. These “personal data lockers” will proliferate because of their convenience, because of real financial incentives from insurers and other service providers and because data-equipped consumers will have powerful new tools with which to drive bargains based on the data about everything they own. These new tools will pour fuel on the re-invention of insurance because all the information needed to provide new types of insurance products will be in the personal cloud-hosted data locker.

Progressively (pun noted, not intended) engineered insurance products that account for the connected generations' expectation of access to data, the abundance of data about products and collectibles and the active collection and accurate valuation of the things people own may turn the 300-year-old insurance industry on its head. Doubtless, the disruption will leave some carriers grappling for handholds and wondering how they could have insured against a different outcome.

This article first appeared in JetSet magazine.

Breakthroughs in Managing (and Insuring) Tangible Assets

In recent years, high-net-worth families have increasingly turned to tangible assets for more than their aesthetic values. A 2012 Barclays report found that high-net-worth individuals in the U.S. hold an average of 9% of their wealth in tangible assets. A 2011 ACE Private Risk Services study of high-net-worth households found that 74% of respondents, all with more than $5 million in investable assets, cited investment value as a reason to purchase rare art or wine, valuable jewelry, sports memorabilia or classic cars. Two-thirds said the potential for appreciation in value was important in their purchase decision.

As values of many categories of tangible assets have escalated, these assets increasingly serve to diversify investment portfolios during periods of volatile market gyrations. In the ACE study, more than half of the respondents reported that the investment diversification value of their tangible assets has become more important to them since 2008.

“Investors are increasingly looking to hard assets, such as valuable art, antiques or fine watches and wine collections, because of the perceived ability of these assets to hold value during market fluctuations,” says Tom Livergood, chief executive officer and founder of The Family Wealth Alliance, a Chicago-based family wealth research and consulting firm. “Across the industry, we’ve seen investors rush to safety and stay there.”

Blind spot

Even as tangible assets gain recognition as a new asset class, high-net-worth individuals rarely bring to their passions for art, wine or jewels the same rigor they have when making financial investments or business decisions. In ACE’s 2011 study, despite the growing number of households reporting greater importance of tangible assets to their investment portfolios, nearly 40% of those surveyed did not have all of their precious items insured against property loss with a valuables policy. Additionally, one in three reported that they were not updating the market value of these assets at least once every three years, and a full 15% of respondents had no formal documentation of their non-financial assets.

“It’s amazing how often some advisers, especially those with sophisticated knowledge of financial markets, suddenly turn unsophisticated when it comes to non-financial assets, notably art,” says Ronald Varney, owner and president of New York-based Ronald Varney Fine Art Advisors.

To Evan Jehle, a New York-based principal at Rothstein Kass, a professional services firm with a significant family practice, wealthy families typically pay 
far less attention to their personal property than to their business affairs. “Our clients would never let something fall through the cracks in their professional lives, but many families have never thought of their tangible assets in this way before.”

Thomas Handler, partner and chairman of the Family Office Practice Group at Handler Thayer, a Chicago-based law firm recognized as a leader in serving family offices, private businesses and high-net-worth individuals, says his office often advises clients who don't have a business plan for their tangible assets. “It is incredibly important for wealthy households to understand how to hold, report, title and insure their non-financial assets in estate planning.”

Challenges of managing tangible assets

Today’s investors have the opportunity 
to reap significant benefits – financially
 and aesthetically – by investing in
tangible assets, but these investments 
pose risks and challenges different from investment
 in traditional assets. Wealthy households and their advisers may cheer the rebounding market for art and other valuables, take comfort that they have diversified their investments and look forward to potential price appreciation in the future. However, those cheers could be premature if owners of non-financial assets fail to understand and properly address the critical issues facing these assets. Those issues include: value and authenticity, documentation, estate and tax planning 
as well as insurance; additionally, owners of tangible assets should embrace the new technology tools that dramatically improve the management of tangible wealth.

Value and Authenticity

The market value of tangible assets can change, sometimes rapidly. In July 2013, a 1954 Mercedes-Benz sold for $30 million, the highest price ever paid for a car at an auction, shattering the previous record of $16.4 million set in 2011. Global sales of wine, diamonds and precious gems have also been increasing, often to record levels. In December 2012, Sotheby’s recorded its highest one-day jewelry sales in the Americas, selling $64.8 million of high-carat diamonds and precious gems. The Live-ex Fine Wine 50 Index reached 106 in April 2013, up 5.3% in the first half of 2013. Over a 10-year period, prices for gold more than quadrupled, only to retreat more recently.

The market for fine art is especially robust. In 2012, Christie’s auction sales totaled more than $6 billion, a 10% increase from 2011. In May 2013, Christie’s reported $640 million of sales in its Post War and Contemporary department in one week, setting an auction record for any individual category.

Dramatic shifts in the market present challenges as well 
as opportunities for investors in tangible assets. “Today’s market is both global and complex,” Varney says. “Modern and contemporary art have made all the headlines, for that is where the greatest demand is today; but by next year the market could be turned upside-down, as happened in the fall of 2008 amid the global financial crisis.

Alan Fausel, vice president and director of the Fine Art Department in the New York office of Bonhams, a London-based auction house, cites the rapidly changing market as a serious issue for investors. “There is a huge risk and reward in today’s market because so many investors are entering uncharted territory. Today’s contemporary market has seen so much volatility and so much uncertainty with newly famous artists, that investors are especially challenged to understand the true value of the works they own.”

Protecting investments in art, jewelry, antiques or wine begins with an appraisal. Smart investors should perform their due diligence to select appraisers with specific expertise in the genre of their assets. “An accurate appraisal is the foundation for every decision 
an investor will make regarding his or her tangible assets,” says Anita Heriot, Philadelphia-based president of Pall Mall Advisors, a U.S. and U.K. art appraisal firm. Before donating, selling, insuring or placing valuable items in a succession plan, investors must know how much everything is worth. “Wealthy individuals must understand that the values of their tangible assets have changed, and these values will continue to change over time,” Heriot says. “Without understanding the value of their property, people cannot even begin to make correct decisions.”

Heriot observes that wealthy individuals sometimes drastically undervalue their tangible assets. She recalls one family that was tracking assets based on appraisals from 1983, with nearly 30 years between consultations. The collection was originally valued at about $2 million, but, after an updated appraisal, the
 fair market value was nearly $100 million. “There were paintings of incredible value hanging on only one nail, including a Rothko with an insurance value of at least $70 million. Had this family known what their property was worth, they certainly would have taken better care
 of it.” An appraisal from a qualified professional can
 also minimize other risks, as well as provide guidance regarding potential fakes and forgeries. In addition, an appraisal can identify other issues that could affect the value of the item or the right to ownership. These include the sale of items made from protected species, protected antiquities or stolen works.

Documentation

All too often, high-net-worth individuals and families find the process of documenting, tracking and managing
the contents of their home, including fine furniture and other valuable items, to be onerous. Proper documentation of personal property typically involves photo or video records, storage of purchase receipts and, in the case of highly valuable items, expert appraisals, proofs of title and provenance and records of any restoration work. Moreover, values need to be regularly updated, sometimes on both a depreciated-value and replacement-cost basis.

“Families rarely keep accurate records of their tangible assets because, quite frankly, it can be a lot of work,” says Jarrett Bostwick, wealth transfer and estate planning specialist at Handler Thayer, the Chicago law firm.

“If someone buys two pieces of art, a piece of jewelry, two watches and a diamond pendant for his wife, then they have to sit down and put a schedule together, contact the insurance company and have them come in and have them ask you a whole bunch of questions, which is kind of a pain. Rarely do our clients partake in this kind of rigor.”

If documentation is done at all, it tends to be completed inadequately and infrequently. ACE Private Risk Services and Trōv have been collaborating on a program in which specialists have examined the contents of more than 3,000 homes of high-net-worth families. In this Home Contents Valuation program, ACE risk consultants used Trōv technology to provide the industry’s first customized estimates of the value of a home’s contents at policy inception. Nearly 50% of the homes evaluated did not have enough insurance to cover their contents, and the average amount of underinsurance exceeded $415,000 per home. Condominium homes were particularly at risk. Nearly 80% had inadequate contents coverage. Among homes warranting an increase in contents coverage, those with a structural value of $2 million to $3 million had an average shortfall of $417,000 in contents coverage; those with a structural value of $5 million to $7.5 million had an average shortfall of $852,000. Furthermore, many valuable items were only protected by general contents coverage in the homeowner policy, when they should have been listed as scheduled items in a valuables policy.

The lack of proper documentation of a family’s tangible assets can lead to wide-ranging problems. “You have to know what you have in order to be worried about it, and to take steps to avoid losing it,” says Joy Berus, attorney at Berus Law Group in Newport Beach, Calif., a specialist in tangible asset protection. “If a family doesn’t have an updated inventory of their valuable possessions, they leave themselves vulnerable to taxes that could have been planned for and reduced, discrepancies, risk of serious financial loss and the inability to pass down their assets to the next generation with a step up in basis. Proper documentation of a household’s tangible assets is the first step in identifying a family’s tangible wealth, and can make the difference between security and paralysis.”

The magnitude of the potential issue is evident in one statistic: Over the next
 30 years, as much as $27 trillion of 
family wealth will be transferred from 
Baby Boomers to their children and grandchildren. That inheritance will include a great deal of tangible assets that will need to be documented, appraised, accounted for and protected.

Wealth managers often encounter situations in which a client dies and the family or trustee does not know where all of the valuables are. “These issues don’t usually come up until a client passes and you have to collect all of the assets and figure out what’s there,” says one wealth manager who works with high-net-worth clients. “Tangible assets aren’t addressed enough in the typical conversations between wealth managers and their clients.”

Handler, the attorney, points to a noted photographer who was living in a retirement home. 
He kept with him a large collection of negatives of images of leaders, celebrities and historical events.
The photographer suffered from dementia, and over
 the years most of the collection slowly disappeared. “Unfortunately, the family did not have a record of everything and didn’t know who took the photographs,” Handler recalls. “We found some of the items on the black market on websites. But the vast majority is never going to see the light of day.”

Berus recalls working with professional athletes and asking if their wealth advisers asked them if they possessed sports memorabilia. “Every one of them said the same thing, ‘Nobody has ever asked before.’ One retired football player talked about how he lost the majority of his lifetime collection because it had been in a fire, and it wasn’t insured. He couldn’t prove what he had and had a major loss because of it.”

Berus adds, “When people don’t know what they have, they can lose money and be taken advantage of by people who do know what they have. You don’t want to lose the value of what you own or be taken advantage of. You also don’t want to cause tax problems for yourself or pay unnecessary taxes. When you know what you have and know what it is really worth, you can make better decisions.”

Loss Prevention

By definition, tangible assets are subject to risks of physical damage, theft and the ravages of time. Yet experts say that high-net-worth families often neglect
 to take steps to protect their art, jewelry, wine and other valuables from these threats. One ACE study, for example, found that 40% of wealthy individuals surveyed failed to take advantage of the services of a risk consultant who could help them reduce the risk of damage and theft.

Collectors do not always realize the risk-prevention measures available to them to help guard against, 
and minimize, exposures, says Heather Becker,
 chief executive officer of the Conservation Center, a Chicago-based provider of conservation services for fine art, textiles, photography and sculptures. “No one wants to think a significant loss will happen to them.”

Many families display or store their precious possessions in ways that increase the risk of loss. For instance, they hang artwork above an active fireplace, where the hot, dry air and soot accelerates deterioration. They neglect to place a historical artifact, such as a letter written by a famous figure, in an archival box protected by anti-ultraviolet protective glass, exposing the artifact to dangerous rays and fumes.
 Or they store a valuable stamp collection in a closet beneath a bathroom. If the tub overflows or the toilet develops a leak, the stamps could be ruined. “So many people forget that these assets – art, wine, gems – are very fragile,” Varney says. “Valuable assets can go from $1 million in value to $0 in the blink of an eye.” Investors who fail to properly address these threats remain vulnerable to severe financial loss.

Even items made of strong, durable materials can be
ar risk. Becker recalls the story of an ancient metal sculpture, which its owner stored in a warehouse for several years while not on display. While the owner made sure the sculpture was stored in a protective crate, the crate was stored on its side, instead of standing up. “The sculpture was severely warped and sustained considerable damage,” Becker says. “There is a cumulative effect to these risks that individuals must account for.”

Insurance

Given the increasing value of rare art, precious gems and fine wine, and the array of physical threats and other financial exposures confronting these pieces, proper insurance represents a critical part of a complete wealth-protection plan. Often the best place for families and their wealth advisers to start addressing this need is with an insurance broker or independent agent who specializes in serving families with emerging or established wealth. These insurance advisers, who can be recognized by their access to specialty insurance carriers, can usually suggest and coordinate services from a variety of experts.

While investors of tangible assets may go to great lengths to acquire the items they desire, they frequently fail to adequately protect them. In a 2012 ACE survey, fully 86% of insurance agents said the families who insure their homes and possessions with mass-market insurance companies likely carry too little insurance for their treasured items. One in three wealthy families was updating the market value of their collections every three years.

“Waiting three years or more mean their valuations will be wildly out of date,” says Fausel of Bonhams.

ACE Private Risk Services and Trōv analyzed 94 valuables schedules to compare stated replacement values with current market values. For the 48 schedules of fine art assets, comprising 1,722 objects, 665 objects were potentially underinsured. For the 46 jewelry schedules, one in four objects was potentially underinsured. Moreover, 32% of all the analyzed items had descriptions that were too vague or incomplete to allow for an accurate valuation. If a loss were to occur, this could lead to a dispute.

Emerging technology

For individuals and families with substantial tangible assets, new technology tools exist to make tracking, analyzing and sharing information about their assets significantly easier and more efficient. Pall Mall’s Heriot sees high demand for these tools: “As tangible assets become more valuable and wealthy families become more invested in their personal property, we see clients begging for a better understanding of what they own and greater knowledge of what it’s all worth.” The goal for wealth advisers and their clients should be to make tracking and analyzing information about personal property regular, everyday actions rather than infrequent behaviors.

Progress is promising. ACE Private Risk Services offers clients access to its Home Contents Valuation service, providing guidance regarding general contents coverage at policy inception–at the moment, coverage for personal property, a home’s contents, is typically assigned based on a percentage of the home’s structural value or it is a guess. Trōv has developed technology, partnerships and applications to tame the unruly mass of data about every tangible asset in its members’ lives. The core of the
 Trōv platform is a private, online digital locker where the information about property and possessions is collected and securely managed (called a Trōv, like treasure trove). Because most of Trōv users’ important personal property is located in their private spaces, Trōv is training appraisers and insurance risk managers to use its Trōv Collect application when they are in their clients’ homes. With the acquired information, a Trōv is activated – and with it a complete knowledge of what each family owns, where it’s located and what it’s worth. Acquisitions can be automatically added to a personal Trōv at retail point-of-sale, via electronic receipts and through a mobile application. The Trōv Mobile app enables members to snap a picture of any acquired item, add any support information, such as a receipt, package art, bar-code or QR-code, and send it to their Trōv in real time. As purchases are added, and as values change within the Trōv, the member can choose to have his or her advisers automatically notified to ensure the items are always accounted for and adequately protected.

Vision of the future

The future of wealth management encompasses an understanding of a client’s tangible assets as well as financial assets, completing the picture of total 
net worth. By using a continually updated inventory
 of personal property, families can manage risk on a real-time basis, applying effective loss-prevention techniques, securing the proper amounts of high-quality insurance coverage and anticipating tax and estate-planning issues. Insurance companies such as ACE will be able to recommend safety measures and introduce coverage rates that are increasingly fair, accurate and economical. Private bankers, estate planning attorneys and family offices will develop deeper relationships with their clients and referral networks. Wealth advisers will be able to expand the perspective they offer to clients and engage other appropriate professionals, such as insurance brokers, on a more timely and routine basis. Advisers who provide clients with a full-circle view of their assets will be well-positioned to gain a competitive advantage.

Cloud services, such as those provided by Trōv, will even enhance enjoyment of prized possessions. With a few simple strokes on a mobile device, an owner will be able to find like-minded collectors. Buying, selling and sharing will become a dynamic experience, and, because it will be easy to track the history of an object, every possession with have a story built into it. 

Conclusion

Demand for tangible assets of art, wine, jewelry and other collectibles is on the upswing, and auction sales across the globe continue to skyrocket. As these tangible assets are increasingly recognized as means of investment diversification, wealth advisers are challenged to provide a full-circle, comprehensive view of a client’s entire portfolio. Fortunately, new technology tools are meeting these ever-expanding demands. Mobile and cloud technology services improve the tracking, management and valuation of tangible assets, providing families and their advisers with greater awareness. Furthermore, these tools enable families to secure comprehensive insurance coverage and loss-prevention services, assess investment risk across both financial and tangible assets and more effectively anticipate tax and estate-planning issues. In today’s digital age, an analysis of any high-net-worth individual’s assets must include these tangible assets to complete the picture of total wealth management.

For the white paper on which this article was based, click here

The Last Analog Generation (and Other Stories of the Dead and Dying)

The Last Analog Generation—let’s call them LAGgards—are departing, and in their wake a fascinating new world is emerging.

I’ve been surprised lately, when meeting with the nation’s leading financial service providers and discussing the tsunami of intergenerational wealth transfer that is upon us. The generation that is now entering (or will soon enter) the work force stands to receive something like $30 trillion of personal wealth over the next 20-30 years. That’s a staggering figure by any measure, but what’s really surprising is the apparent lack of preparedness and stunning dearth of appreciation for the opportunity – and potential threat – this massive wealth transfer represents to stalwart companies and even entire industry sectors.

For context, according to research, there exists roughly $230 trillion of personal wealth around the globe. That’s both financial wealth, like cash and its numerous equivalents, and real and personal property; the figure does not include corporate or public holdings. To give some sense of perspective to the enormity of that figure, just consider that the gross world product (the combined market value of all the products and services produced in one year by all the countries in the world) totaled approximately $85 trillion in 2012. Thinking about the number another way: To accomplish the transfer of $30 trillion over the next 30 years would mean that more than $1.9 million would have to change hands every minute.

By the time the last baby-boomer has shuffled off this mortal coil, about 13% of all global personal wealth will have changed hands in one form or another. Understanding some of the techno-societal distinctions between the bequeathers and the bequeathees should be a discipline required for anyone who aspires to make sense of the opportunities or threats attendant to the wealth transfer.

Because we develop a sort of digital life for the things in our users’ lives (by collecting and digitally managing all the information about those things), Trōv is becoming a technological bridge between the LAGgards, who were born before the digitization of everything, and the emerging generations who are indisputably “born digital.” In our interactions with users and the service providers that are precariously dangling between these two distinct constituencies, we are developing a sense for both parties. A couple of the big thoughts that seem to aptly describe what influences the perspectives of two groups are at once technological and sociological: the death of privacy and the power of information symmetry.  

Privacy is dead

LAGgards are concerned that their personal information remains private. Okay, this should neither surprise nor irritate any of us. However, the norms for what is considered private are being entirely redefined by the constant revelations of breaches (both nefarious and national) – and the new (ab)normal boundaries of self-disclosure regularly displayed on the massively adopted social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and their do-alikes.

Just take a peek (if you have the stomach for it) at Instagram’s ersatz cult of spoiled children referenced as #richkidsofinstagram. Photos are regularly posted depicting the profligate lives of a generation of an über-wealthy and unbelievably overexposed generation reveling in their latest acquisitive binge or imbibing impossibly costly libations.

As Robert Scoble, one of the oracles for the emerging generation of Digital Natives, intimated to me, privacy is all but dead, and it is no longer a core issue of the emerging generations. So what? Self-disclosure and widely available information about all connected people and institutions will make a profound impact on reputations: personal, corporate and governmental, and if you’re attempting to engage the new generation of wealthy, transparency is mere table stakes, at best.

Information symmetry — your advisor is dead (he just doesn’t know it, yet) 

Information symmetry will be the death of intermediated businesses. When Netflix started shipping CDs and DVDs to homes throughout the U.S. in the late 1990s, the writing was on the wall for the leading distributors of home video. And, as cloud storage and high-bandwidth digital pipelines became ubiquitous and increasingly affordable, Blockbuster (as a proxy for all things analog) scuttled its storefront retail business – bowing out because its distribution channel was obliterated by technology’s relentless march.

Retail auto sales have undergone a somewhat similar coming-of-(digital) age, as well. For years, LAGgards have been subject to the demeaning process of haggling over price, because details about costs were kept intentionally opaque, giving the salesperson the information advantage. (This imbalance in access to data is sometimes referred to as information asymmetry). The sales process was successfully upended when data from the likes of Carfax and Kelly Bluebook were made instantly accessible to anyone with an interest and a browser. 

For roughly similar reasons, LAGgards have grown dependent on trusted advisers, various specialists and brokers to make decisions about many of their important investments, risk, spending and even medical choices. Data asymmetry is at the very center of the LAGgards’ dependence on these data-equipped intermediaries, and models for business — even entire business sectors — have been built on its expected continuation. 

But make no mistake, these intermediated, information-unbalanced businesses are (or soon will be) in trouble; their added value questionable. With massive data availability, the information-scales are being leveled, and with instant, mobile connectivity, the generation-digitalis is no longer apt to transact or make decisions through a human intermediary. The generations of Born Digitals demand immediate, hands-on, intermediary-free access to nearly all aspects of their lives. 

So what? If your livelihood assumes that your clients will be dependent on you because you alone hold the magic elixir of unique information, beware. You might need to consider embracing the new models of info-egalitarianism rather than resisting them. 

To wit, we recently began testing an in-app capability to insure a newly acquired item at point-of-sale with literally the push of a button. This action alerts the broker-of-record to information that had been previously unavailable and carries tremendous customer-retention and quality-of-service implications (not to mention risk management and potential revenue upticks).

I have been perplexed by some brokers, who appear more concerned about the incremental work that this might create than the expansion and quality of their service. Powered by data accessibility, irrespective of our entrenched operations, the march toward disintermediation is inexorable.

Although these two ideas — personal privacy and disintermediation –- may appear to be distinct families of thought, they are much more than distant cousins. Indeed, they are utterly related and perhaps alone frame the most important distinctions between the LAGgards and the Born Digitals.  

If you depend on your intermediated services and expect them to remain relatively unchanged, you may be setting yourself up for incalculable risk (and you’re most likely a LAGgard). However, if you are comfortable with gobs of information floating around in the cloud and are adopting the tools that help you benefit, then you are likely going to survive the turbulence.

The opportunities arising from the merging of data and disintermediation are just becoming evident – and these trends will entirely reshape seemingly unassailable businesses and entire industries. 

As the fabric of personal information privacy becomes increasingly threadbare, the expectation for transparency in all segments of commercial life will be elevated to a prerequisite for any type of engagement. And as new generations of shoppers, investors and the “serviced” become less concerned about privacy and more connected to — and facile with — data, business as usual will be anything but.

(This article first appeared in JetSet magazine.)