During a podcast I recorded last week with Capgemini’s global insurance lead, Seth Rachlin, we went on at some length about a pet peeve of mine: the insurance industry’s archaic and often downright unfriendly language.
While I’ve hit this topic before (most notably here), I haven’t exactly seen much change in the past several years, so I’ll keep harping on the problem. I realize that not everyone focuses on language as much as I do — coming from a family with half a century as copy editors at the Wall Street Journal will shape your perspective — but I believe that insurance’s insular language limits our ability to entertain outside perspectives.
As the saying goes, “We shape our tools, and then our tools shape us.”
The particular issue that set Seth and me off is the notion of the “customer.” That’s hardly an archaic or unfriendly term — in normal use. But insurers often refer to brokers and agents as their customers. I love brokers and agents, but, sorry, they aren’t the customers. The people who pay the premiums, who face the risks, who file the claims — those are the customers.
At a time when we’re all supposedly focusing on the customer experience, how can we even begin to get it right if our language steers us toward serving those who sell rather than those who actually use our products?
Almost as bad: In just about every industry, interactions are handled by “customer service representatives.” Why can’t insurance use that term? Why send me an “adjuster,” whose title suggests that either the insurer doesn’t think I’m bright enough to get the claim right on my own or that I’m downright dishonest and need to be checked out? The adjuster can do exactly the same job as always. Let’s just give customers a friendlier term.
Or: Why are payments to customers referred to as “losses”? When a bank or mutual fund sends me money I’ve earned, it’s paying me interest or capital gains. Corporations pay me dividends. None of these firms talk about losses just because money has moved from them to me. So, why does the insurance industry refer to a payment on my behalf to a doctor as a “medical loss”? Why is a payment to help me recover from property damage in a storm a “catastrophe loss”? Why isn’t a “loss” called a “payment to a cherished customer to help the person/business recover in a time of need”?
Yeah, that’s a bit long, but surely “claims” or “paid claims” could replace “losses.”
Just changing three terms — “customer,” “adjuster” and “loss” — would go a long way toward reorienting the industry’s thinking and lead to a friendlier experience for customers, but let’s not stop there. Here are some other changes that the insurance industry should make immediately to its language to make it more accessible to customers:
- Binder → temporary insurance
- Rider → addition or supplement
- Endorsement → amendment
- Underwriting → pricing risk
- Excess lines, surplus lines, subrogation, capitation, inland marine (inland marine!) → something that is meaningful to the customer….
- What else? (I’d welcome thoughts in the comments section here or on LinkedIn, where this will also be posted.)
I realize that jargon can make us seem like we have inside knowledge. When my closest childhood friend went to medical school, he told me that running straight down the middle of our torsos is a narrow bit of fibrous tissue that looks like a white line. “It’s called the linea alba,” he said. “You know what that means in English? The direction translation is, ‘white line.’ But you sound smarter when you say it in Latin.”
I also realize that those in the industry understand all the terms and thus feel no need to change. But if we’re really to get outside our own heads and see the world from the customer point of view, then fixing our language would be a great place to start.
P.S. Here are the six articles I’d like to highlight from the past week:
With automated claims processing, the turnaround time for settlement will be measured in minutes rather than days or weeks.
How employees will be recruited, trained and retained will be quite different – and organizations need to start on that journey today.
Firms struggle because they view AI initiatives as small projects rather than a product requiring continuing maintenance and investment.
If this spring La Nina holds together, the central plains could get back to seeing severe weather that was lacking last year.
Under the incoming administration, the focus on consumer protection regulation will rise for financial services, including insurance.
In 2021, climate-change actions by U.S. regulators will create both challenges and opportunities for insurers.